Top 5 Reasons to Switch from ClearCase to AccuRev
Geographically distributed and outsourced application development using ClearCase MultiSite or ClearCase Remote Client is not economically or practically sustainable. When ClearCase was first deployed, you had fewer distributed users, and outsourced development probably wasn't even on your roadmap. Today, the costs, complications and compromises of managing remote teams with ClearCase are prohibitive and not necessary.
See AccuRev vs. ClearCase in Action
Enforced Hierarchy for Appropriate Staging
Built-in Private Versioning
Retargeting work in progress
The AccuRev Advantage over ClearCase
This document compares the core capabilities of AccuRev to those of IBM Rational ClearCase, with a focus on the fundamental technical advantages and corresponding business value that validate why AccuRev is the best choice for highly parallel and geographically distributed development teams that require an optimal productivity-to-cost ratio.
READ WHITE PAPER
Free Competitive Analysis
This document compares AccuRev to IBM Rational ClearCase. Comparisons are made for both base ClearCase and ClearCase using UCM. The comparison begins with qualitative aspects of both tools. Performance benchmarks are then provided for basic SCM operations.
Competitive Analysis Performance & Scalability Analysis
The Joy of Moving from ClearCase to AccuRev
- Chris Walquist Walquist Consulting Inc.
"With AccuRev, a new intermediate stream is a near-trivial matter of right-clicking a new stream and dragging the existing stream (or workspace) under the new stream. The pain of ClearCase config specs is a dim memory."