<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When SCM meets Web 2.0 &#8211; Cool Widget at Orbitz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accurev.com/blog//2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu,  4 Mar 2010 23:02:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cboran</title>
		<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>cboran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurev.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-442</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about that Troy. It depends on your organisation. While the command to create a branch may take mere seconds, I know at the company I used to work for creating a branch was a painful process that would take days because of all the red tape and process...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about that Troy. It depends on your organisation. While the command to create a branch may take mere seconds, I know at the company I used to work for creating a branch was a painful process that would take days because of all the red tape and process&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurev.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-443</guid>
		<description>John, be fair.  Branching in SVN takes mere seconds!  It&#039;s not until you have to merge back that it starts taking days...

James, noted the difference between streams and branches.

What would be interesting is the possibility of AccuRev offering (customisable/configurable?) feeds like this out of the box, or through some supported add-on.  That would help bring techniques like this into the mainstream, and make the overall AccuRev package more attractive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, be fair.  Branching in SVN takes mere seconds!  It&#8217;s not until you have to merge back that it starts taking days&#8230;</p>
<p>James, noted the difference between streams and branches.</p>
<p>What would be interesting is the possibility of AccuRev offering (customisable/configurable?) feeds like this out of the box, or through some supported add-on.  That would help bring techniques like this into the mainstream, and make the overall AccuRev package more attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P. Wood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Accurev blogs about Orbitz technology</title>
		<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>John P. Wood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Accurev blogs about Orbitz technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurev.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-444</guid>
		<description>[...] just picked up on a post to the Accurev blog about some of the cool things our Development Technologies team has been doing at Orbitz.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just picked up on a post to the Accurev blog about some of the cool things our Development Technologies team has been doing at Orbitz.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurev.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-445</guid>
		<description>SVN with RSS - that&#039;s rich! Now you can keep track in your newsreader of how many hours it took to create a branch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SVN with RSS &#8211; that&#8217;s rich! Now you can keep track in your newsreader of how many hours it took to create a branch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtalbott</title>
		<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>jtalbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurev.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Hi Troy,

Your point about RSS feeds and WebSVN is correct and well taken.  The comment about &quot;stretching their SCM environment&quot; wasn&#039;t meant to be specific about the RSS example, but more a reflection of organizations that are innovative with regard to the tools they utilize.  However, in conjunction with that, the inherent built-in advantages that AccuRev&#039;s stream-based architecture provides when compared to branch-and-label systems means that this type of solution is actually *not* available with any other SCM tool...

Cheers,
~James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Troy,</p>
<p>Your point about RSS feeds and WebSVN is correct and well taken.  The comment about &#8220;stretching their SCM environment&#8221; wasn&#8217;t meant to be specific about the RSS example, but more a reflection of organizations that are innovative with regard to the tools they utilize.  However, in conjunction with that, the inherent built-in advantages that AccuRev&#8217;s stream-based architecture provides when compared to branch-and-label systems means that this type of solution is actually *not* available with any other SCM tool&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
~James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.accurev.com/blog/2008/04/17/when-scm-meets-web-20-cool-widget-at-orbitz/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurev.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-447</guid>
		<description>I think many of the ideas posted here are great, but I can&#039;t agree with the idea of RSS feeds &quot;stretching their SCM environment beyond anything previously achievable&quot;.

WebSVN (which is of course *not* to say SVN itself) has offered RSS feeds out of the box on an SVN respository, or any subtree in the repository, for a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many of the ideas posted here are great, but I can&#8217;t agree with the idea of RSS feeds &#8220;stretching their SCM environment beyond anything previously achievable&#8221;.</p>
<p>WebSVN (which is of course *not* to say SVN itself) has offered RSS feeds out of the box on an SVN respository, or any subtree in the repository, for a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
